Thursday, January 27, 2011

American Killer - Killing 3 and Injuring 2

27th January 2011, an employee of US Consulate in Lahore killed three people in Lahore. According to details, US national named Raymond David shot at 2 persons at Qartaba Chowk and hit another bike rider while driving rashly, in an attempt to to escape the scene. The motorcyclist Ubaidur Rehman was killed on the spot while other two injured

I must say, after drone attacks, this is another gift from the government of US; they are trying to test our patience. May Allah help us in differentiating between enemies and friends.

I don't understand, under such security situation where we had a blast in the city just couple of days back, why this official was wandering near Mozzang? Was he planning to eat fish and nehari or he must be visiting a grave in Miani sb.

According to a statement that he did that in self defence.....now if we do it in self defence, we are terrorist.... but if an Amerian does this.... then its self defence.

By the way, who will be the first one to protect him? After all its a huge opportunity to please our masters.

May Allah help us.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Answers Wanted? Killing of Salman Taseer

Salman Taseer, Governor of the Punjab Province, was shot dead by his security guard, an Elite force commando named Malik Mumtaz Hussain Qadri on Tuesday 4th January 2010 in Islamabad.

The media “Lion” has a new story to eat and digest for at least three or four days and almost every channel is now discussing Salman Taseer, Toheen-e-Risalat, etc. keeping the media injected views aside, I have a few simple questions:

1. Why the Governor passed such blunt remarks regarding a law which was passed by the parliament “unanimously” in 1985?

2. Why the Governor intervened in Aasia’s case which was already in court?

3. The Governor kept on taking Aasia’s name, but why didn’t he ever make a similar plea for Aafia Siddiqui?

4. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think there are a lot people in Jails suffering the same death penalty under a different section, the famous “dafa 302”; why no government official is sending letters to the President to waive of their penalties?

5. If there is a flaw in the court procedure, why there is a need to “change” the law?

6. In the proposed amendment of the law, why there is a focus on removing the death penalty? Will this mean more violation because now the accused can wander more freely hearting the feelings of the majority?

7. We respect the rights of minorities in Pakistan….what about the respect for the rights of majorities?


May Allah help us all!

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Why it only happens in Pakistan?

1. Immediately after suicide bombing, how quickly the identity of the person/party is established after the blast and most of the time some suspicious people are also captured from the site. But to-date, we haven't seen a public investigation report. Keeping the AZAD media in mind, its a surprise to me that no report is made public.

2. Nowadays multiple parties are claiming responsibility for a single event. So you get Threek e Taliban, Saphe Sahaba, Laskre Jhangvi, lashkarey Taiba etc... all in for a single event. Imagine all these organizations operating in such close coordination whereas our authorities are totally clueless.

3. When claiming the responsibility of an attack the offender actually mentions its division e.g. Threek e Taliban (Punjab)

On a personal level, I have seen enough rubbish from our beloved media. I still remember 10th Moharram Karachi incident and how the whole story was developed only to find out that It was not a suicide attack at all. Then there is the Benazir murder case, where I think our authorities did capture some telephonic conversation regarding the culprits but still no one is charged with the murder.

The moral of this story is, don’t believe ANYTHING the news channels in Pakistan tell you because none of their information is verified and they are there to sell ads and make money, they do not have the people’s interest at heart.

Totally unacceptable!

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-koran-burning-20100908,0,1812151,print.story

and those who still thinks that only a few people are doing this and the US government has nothing to do with it.... then why they have not taken that "maloon" behind bars. whereas on the other side, Only “denying” holocaust is explicitly or implicitly illegal in 13 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Switzerland. E.g. in Austria, you can be punished with imprisonment up to twenty years.

http://send2mjk.blogspot.com/2008/04/freedom-of-speech.html

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Avoid Provident Fund

The provident fund is a kind of an investment fund maintained by the employer (provident fund trustees, which are nominated by the employer, are responsible for provident fund management). Provident fund generates its revenue from the contribution made by employee and employer.

At the end of a given month, a percentage amount (normally 6% of the basic employee’s salary) is deducted from the employee’s pay cheque and the same amount is contributed by the employer. The total of the contribution from all employees is then deposited in a profit generating activity. Here comes the problem, generally this amount is deposited in a bank or other “interest” oriented activity and the interest collected is then distributed equally among all the employee on proportionate basis.

I am not saying that all provident funds are invested in a similar manner BUT one should check with their respective HR/Accounts department to know how their provident fund is generating the profit. If its banks or other interest oriented activities, then please decide based on the following verdict of Allah Almighty:

"Allah decreases interest and increases sadqah"

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Interest (usury)‏

"Those who devour usury will not stand except as stands one whom the Satan by his touch has driven to madness. That is because they say, "trade is like usury", but Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden usury" -- (Surah Al-baqarah verse no.275)

"Allah will deprive usury of all blessing, and will give increase for deeds of charity, for he does not love any ungrateful sinner." -- (Surah Al-baqarah verse no.276)

"Oh you who believe! Fear Allah and give up what remains of your demand for usury if you are indeed believers." -- (Surah Al-baqarah verse no.278)

Hazrat Jabir radiyallahu anhu has reported that the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alaihe wasallm cursed the devourer of usury, its payer, its scribe and its two witnesses. He also said that they were equal (in sin) -- (Muslim)

Hazrat Abu Hurairah radiyallahu anhu reported that the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alaihe wasallm said : Usury has got seventy divisions. The easiest division of them is a man marrying his mother. -- (Ibn Majah)

Hazrat Abu Hurairah radiyallahu anhu reported that the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alaihe wasallm said: I came across some people in the night in which I was taken to the heavens. Their stomachs were like houses wherein there were serpents, which could be seen from the front of their stomachs. I asked: O Gabriel! Who are these people? He replied these are those who devoured usury. -- (Ahmed, Ibn Majah)

Conclusion:
The summary of the matter is that interest is hazardous and should be abstained from in all manners. If anybody has a case they wish to solve then they should contact a Mufti and present their problem as it is. It’s not worth destroying the eternal life of the hereafter, just so that we may have a few more comforts in a life which can come to an end any moment. If for a moment, we think of worldly benefits alone then the following statement is the final verdict:

"Allah decreases interest and increases sadqah"

Let's all review our daily transactions and try to avoid all such matters which are considered interest/usury.

May ALLAH help us all!

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Contradiction - A good example

Quoting from BBC’s online article:
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/country_profiles/1162668.stm)

“Afghanistan's drugs industry makes up around 60% of the economy. The trade has boomed since the fall of the Taliban and the country supplies 93% of the world's opium, the raw ingredient of heroin.

International bodies and governments say the drugs trade is helping to fuel the Taliban insurgency, which is estimated to receive up to US$100m a year from the trade.
The UN Office on Drugs and Crime has called on Afghanistan to target the major traffickers and corrupt government officials, who it says operate with impunity in the country.”

Now in the first para, the author is claiming that the drug industry has boomed since the “FALL” of Taliban (this means that this trade was not booming under Taliban)….. but in the second para, the author is quoting international bodies and governments that the drug industry is helping Taliban and they are actually receiving around US $100m.

NOW IF THE TALIBANS IN AFGHANISTAN WERE SO CONVINCED ABOUT RECEIVING CASH FROM DRUG INCOME, THEN WHY THEY DID NOT ALLOW THIS INDUSTRY TO FLOURISH UNDER THEIR OWN REGIME???

<<<>>>>
You people must be thinking why I am circulating this article…… so that we don’t just blindly believe what media is telling/showing us! (so don’t even believe me, see the article online and judge yourself)